Tactical Endings

Click on the piece you want to move and then on the target square.
You have 3 guesses before the solution is revealed. Hint: go for mate or stalemate!

The first two puzzles come from Jeno Ban’s classic book The Tactics of End-Games. There are also games by our members.








1. ?

H. Rinck

Composition
1921


1. Re7+ Kh8 2. Kh6! Rge8 2… Rgf8 3. Rh7+ Kg8 4. Rg1# 3. Rdd7! Kg8 4. Rg7+ Kh8 4… Kf8 5. Rdf7# 5. Rh7+ Kg8 6. Rdg7+ Kf8 7. Rh8# 1-0









1. ?

Richard Reti

Composition
1925


1. Rf3! g2 2. Bf1!! g1=Q 2… g1=N! 3. Rd3! Kh1 4. Ke4 Kh2 5. Kf4 Kh1 6. Kg3 wins the Knight and forces mate 3. Rh3# 1-0









1… ?

White
Black

Westfield Quads
Westfield, NJ, 2005


Steve Stoyko says he observed the following position in a master game at a local tournament. The players will remain anonymous. Black took a draw in this winning position. Suffice to say they were playing at a relatively fast time control.

1… Nf5+! Black can take a draw by 1… Nxd5+? 2. cxd5 Qe1+ 3. Kf3 Qd1+ 4. Kg2 Qxd5+= 2. Ke4 2. Kf4 Qg4+ 3. Ke5 f6+ 4. Qxf6 (4. Ke6 Nd6+ 5. Ke7 Qd7#) 4… gxf6+ 2… Qe2+ 3. Kxf5 Qg4+ 4. Ke5 f6+ 0-1 [Michael Goeller]









1… ?

Tigran Petrosian
Steve Stoyko

Simultaneous Exhibition
Westfield, NJ, 1976


Steve Stoyko had this position in a game against Tigran Petrosian in a simultaneous exhibition. All of the other games had concluded in victories for the former champion, and so he was seated in a chair across from Steve for the remainder of their game. Steve sacrificed his pawns to reach this ending, which he recognized to be a draw, though it is not one you are likely to find in a book. He was rather surprised when Petrosian insisted on playing it out, and after several attempts at winning, the former champ gave up and knocked over the pieces in disgust. Steve, who had always been a great admirer of Petrosian’s up to that point, was disappointed, not only in his behavior but in his both failing to win the game and also failing to recognize the draw. According to Scott Massey, who was at the event, Steve said “Petrosian’s a fraud.” The ending, though, is not — though your computer will still think it is a win in the final position.

1… Kh8! 2. Ke7 2. Kxf8= 2… Kg7 3. Bf5 Kh8 4. Kf6 Ng6!= 1/2-1/2









27. ?

 B09

Michael Goeller (1940)
Robert Bazaz (1875)

Candidate Expert Invitational
West Orange, NJ, 1981


27. Rxh5+ Kg8 Only now does Black see 27… Kg6?? 28. Rh6# 28. Bh6 Kh7 Forced to avoid Bg7 and Rh8#. 29. Bf4+! Played to prevent …f4. 29… Kg8 29… Kg6?? 30. Rh6# 30. h4! Rd8? Black can only save himself by 30… Bc4 31. Kf2! Re8 32. Bh6 Re2+ (32… Be2 33. Rxf5) 33. Kg1! (33. Kg3!?) 33… Re1+ (33… Bd5 34. Rg5+ Kh7 35. Bg7) 34. Kh2 Be2 35. Rxf5 and White’s two-pawn advantage gives him excellent winning chances. 31. Bh6 Rd1+ 32. Kh2 Kh7 Mate is unavoidable: 32… f4 33. Bg7 f3 34. Rh8# 33. Bg7+ Kg6 34. Rh6# and the dark square attack is triumphant. 1-0 [Michael Goeller]









64. ?

Mark Kernighan (2230)
Dragan Milovanovic (2245)

Hamilton Quads (3)
Hamilton, NJ, 2004


64. a6! h2 65. a7 h1=Q 66. a8=Q Qh2 66… Kg4 67. Rf2+! Kg3 (67… Kg5 68. Rxg2+) 68. Qf3+ Kh4 69. Rxg2 67. Qd8+ Kg4 67… g5 68. Qh8+ Kg4 69. Qd4+ Kh5 70. Rh3+! 67… Rg5 68. Qd4+ Rg4 69. Qh8+ Kg5 70. Qxh2 68. Rf2+! Kg3 69. Qg5+! Kh3 69… Kxf2? 70. Qe3# 70. Qh6+ Kg3 71. Qxg6+ 71. Rf3+! Kg4 72. Rf4+ Kg3 73. Qg5+ Kh3 74. Rh4# 71… Kxf2 71… Kh3 72. Qh5+ Kg3 73. Rf3# 72. Qxf5+ Kg3 73. Qg4+ Kf2 74. Qf3+ Kg1 75. Qf1# 1-0

 

 

Updated June 15, 2005